Custom Search
Click here for Memorandum of Law on the
Name!
Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!
Click here for Treatise 'on' Arrest (once regarded as elementary)
Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!
Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!
Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!



 

"Properly displaying the American flag is standing upon the American flag, enabled, thanks to America, for reaching higher" - member of Congress.  Perhaps true, perhaps false, since Congress, a voice of the people, commands government employees only, if harmonically resonating, causing great de-structurizations as, too, earthquakes reaching harmonics within concrete for elevated freeways cause great de-structurizations and pulverize what was formerly known as "molecules ordered for concrete."  "For what is the law if not a stepstool for reaching higher -- 'Don't Tread On 'Me''; this me; that me; any me; love thine anyme; love that anyme; love this anyme; love any'me'; those who say 'don't' have tread on me often, and I have wanted that those who say 'don't' instead say 'don't' at those who tread on me.  There is no such event as an illegal alien, no such event as an undocumented alien, no such event as an unwritten alien, no such event as an unlawful alien who, in mere existence (birth) is criminal (Article IX, Bill of Rights to the U.S. Constitution names 'the people' rather than 'citizen' and, so, therefore, all people are legal (written) and all people are lawful (Supreme Law of the Land) otherwise hypocrisy was the ink for those who, as nongovernment (noncitizens), wrote the first constitution and wrote Article IX, itself, both of and for Article IX of the Bill of Rights to the U.S. Constitution, utterly having understood human nature (excited utterances also included) -- and so long ago, already having understood human nature, that we have clearly dumbed down, forgotten human nature, as the signers for the Declaration of Independence were merely aged to approximately 33-35 years of age, and would teach the constitution to children (posterity) second only to learning a language).  One rears a child; one either raises or razes cattle."  "Let those who have ears hear" is the best ya got, baby Jesus, at the book of revelation?  How ya gunna stop one who has ears from hearing?  By writing, of course, and the soundalikes stop.  No more rushing waters; no more rushing "wait"ers; no more rushing "what"ers.  Wants upon a time, let's add, and, let's subtract, upon the book of revelation and receive the plagues mentioned at the last chapter of the book of (for) revelation, shall I?  But as a matter of course, of course.  Bring it "on," baby Jesus, since "on" is for planet-bound entities.  We escaped Bank of England, and, now, Bank of America issued credit (cards) to noncitizens, commercially documented to a self-approved degree, and perhaps is being punished.  A wonderful name, "Bank of America," for re-minding us of the escape from Bank of England at the American Revolution.  Did  Bank of America find the firebreak model that saves the plane's/planet's economy, with lending credit to noncitizens?  Well, elevated freeways absorb harmonics without structural damage if tall enough.

Recipients of e-mails (you) were categorically named at The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and named at The Colbert Report, since that's where we get our new news nowadays (nowadaze?) if we're missing C-Span.  Oh yeah, while you read these optional thoughts and feelings for you to borrow, America, Canada, and others, take in the Memorandum of Law on the Name that you see here, where there your name is addressed ("ad"dressed; like ab-duction and ad-duction of arms at a doctor's office exam).

(Treatise on Arrest and False Imprisonment, by Charles A. Weisman; see summons form, already drafted for you and quite shockingly probative at simple traffic stops.  For example, you're already under arrest at the moment that you fear consequences of continued right to travel during flashing police lights, and you're unleashing police upon your neighbors unless you collect, say, $10,000 as indicated upon the already-drafted-for-you summons.)

Next Site Update Planned:   GoodbunnySunday.

Holocaust or hollow cost.  Until we get "bad Friday, good Sunday" right, many church practices are merely a distraction, pulping the "it" that was a woodstapled carpenter (Hebrews 6:6). Hitler's ears heard "J.C. Ovens" repeated during the victories of Jesse Owens, at the Deutsch inflection for "w." 

Ronald Reagan appointed the Grace Commission to trace each penny of government spending.  The Grace Commission's final findings were, money is printed, spent for government jobs, government employees trickle money to the supermarkets and other wonderful people since employees eat, and the people send each and every penny of income tax not to America but out of the country into something called "International Monetary Fund" therefore both democratic taxation and republican taxation is a lie, but not just any lie, but of dead men's laws, like of dead men's laws is "good Friday, woodstapled carpenter, ignoring the part we care about most, something about controlling death, and subconsciously now maybe we can start cellular telomere nondegradation without stigma and without stigmata of people poking our conscience, the conscience, the mind of Christ."  Who knows if Ronnie Reagan said that, but the Grace Commission President Ronald Reagan did appoint, a mouth for God (that is, if a God exists, especially since evolution (a healthy competition) would commence if Ronnie obeyed, "Speak as though you speak the very words of God" from "the Holy Bible.")  In analyzing the words, "Speak as though you speak the very words of God," we find the ability to start a sentence with, "Though you speak the words of God, what's this about triple-paying at corporate bail-outs when we buy product for which we already paid at the bail-out."  Analyzing?  Anal-retentive?  Anal-wise-ing?  Anal-why-zing? 

Hey, Neighbor, though you speak the words of God (zing!), you caused hate in us against IRS agents how?  To prompt God's seeing the innocence of IRS agents?  The self-named patriots who counter IRS agents are in danger of the fires of hell, because the substitute option was to speed IRS work, revealing what can be revealed (2 Peter 3:12) since U.S. Supreme Court decisions versus U.S. Supreme Court decisions are what set your environment prior your birth and set the margins of error for revelation, already written (pre-scribed) waiting for the obedient Christ, even, at six million statutes and counting (Athenian ostracization as punishment versus Spartan ten laws posted, as at American old west towns, with very bad things happening upon knowing violation).  Triple-paying for bank product for which we already paid at two bail-outs (year 1933 across the states, all banks bailed out for antiDepression bank structures, somehow magically needing bail-out recently instead of the brilliant invention of re-organization), won't the angry mob fall on the poor unknowing banks thrown to us wolves at quadruple-paying detected?  With generational loss of knowledge, too, perhaps bail-outs have happened for 29,000 years and we're paying 5,000 times for one product (Catholic church condemned as usury 1% loans, so banks competed for your contracts at fractions of 1%).  Exactly how are the banks sacrificed today, if the last sacrifice was baby Jesus?

"Oh, that carpenter is possessed of the devil, let's woodstaple the carpenter.."

Banks bank, and only painfully watch borrowers untempted at high interest, high interest "done to them, done to banks, without banker choice."  Would you like to know a secret?  A very smart man, a very caring man, body and mind broken, wanting to please everyone, simply for self-safety, self-peace, self-relief at conscience (loving the law, probably), was rumored as having said, "I am Legion, 'for' the 'we are many,' not against the 'we are many.'"

Ah, Legion.  The same self-serving is found at Hebrews 12:2 and in breast-feeding, where mothers lessen guilt at 'the' cry, extremely self-serving for lessening guilt -- unvented, what has become of you, as you run from playing the role of Pontious Pilate instead of embracing the role of Pontious Pilate, as you are Pontious Pilate in every sense of the effectiveness, at crucifixions of degree and crucifixions all-or-nothing, just as effective for cancelling your "so what" where you wash your hands prior the kill order (premature).  A bunch of silly rumors of dead men, if evidence surfaces that a planet is round instead of flat, is best kept in mind.  "So what" translates, quite simply, into, "Say the word 'what,' I dare you, for my salespitch is wondrous for a nontangible crucifixion of degree (indifference when I say 'so' prior 'what' through even the smallest body language, dear poker-players); a borrower prepared for borrowing yet untempted is the flip-side pain of bankers paining over absent borrowers)."

Solving the entire economic crisis:  The very nature of today's monetized debt system tempts me to tempt you, "Look at rich bankers, always pushing out their bathtub full of cash, unlike you who hoarde for one bathtub full of cash; rich bankers push the bathtub full of cash out the door, at interest, for returning two bathtubs full of cash, while you cling to your one bathtub of cash; then rich bankers push two bathtubs of cash out the door, at interest, for returning four bathtubs full of cash, for always, always, always, pushing negative value, monetized debt out, out, out, since each time federal reserve notes are ARRIVING, that's increasing debt, and each time federal reserve notes are pushed out, that's decreasing debt, quote, 'in my own establishment,' to push debt out; therefore, quite simply, start loaning money, or you're fundamentally incompatible with today's federal reserve note system. So two solutions exist separately, or in combination(1) Learn from Stephen Colbert's guest, at The Colbert Report, 'Banker to the Poor,' who sees greater consistent returns from 1%, 2% loans than other banks see returns [especially since the Catholic church condemned as usury 1% loans, long ago; suddenly, the poor vanish for a large, healthy middle class]"; and/or (2) Likewise, learn from Jon Stewart's guest "The Daily Show (2/2/2009)" offering trickle-up economics, stimulating not the rich but stimulating the economy instead of stimulating the rich, simply sending $1,500.00 to each employee and $1,500.00 to the employer who keeps that employee -- I do believe that if the working class vanished, the rest of the people would die, and if the rich vanished, the working class would become rich -- spending part of the stimulus packages for employers gaining $1,500.00 per employee nonterminated, and spending the second part of the stimulus packages for employee payroll-tax cuts causing increased spending as consumers at stores using the payroll-tax cuts of $1,500.00 per employee, summing into solving the entire economic crisis then seeming easy, with both Solution #1 and Solution #2 available for implementation or separately implemented: watch the gutter-fearing poor and the gutter-fearing wealthy, (combined, wealth-loving poor, wealth-loving wealthy) save the plane's/planet's economy with payroll taxes cut in half (Solution #2), and/or the first option, Solution #1, low-interest loans (like a firefighter's firebreak, a line of fire to prevent fire jumping over the scorched line; an entity can hardly try a firebreak model using ultra-high interest, since that entity will simply bankrupt with no borrowers) minus windfall profits, price-gouging anomalies, et cetera, the sort happening today, in the contrasted paradigm, for a select few while banks widely wither.  Sober valuation for houses and all other property would result as a side effect.  How?  The top 5% wealthy feel, "There aren't many wealthy people; but I like rubies or emeralds or diamonds if I can trade later while I'm not busy philanthropically giving (mineminemineminemine, loving anyme, too watching that bottom line, enemy mine (movie, Enemy Mine, about aliens (1985))), exotic metals and minerals from an 'always there' asteroid belt and ocean floor sonically -- have you a far-sight X-ray machine for the ocean-phase of asteroid travel, or some other densitometer, because if a hull withstands oceans..." -- and thus the top 95% wealthy (using monetized debt and using rubies also, monetized value) lift the former top 5% wealthy, from below or from above, depending upon whether or not the former top 5% clings to winning (low-interest loans) or clings to losing (windfalls, price-gouging anomalies, et cetera), from presumable statistics alone.

Irony is a woodstapled carpenter, and irony is all honest banks having been withered using environment only for the profit of a select few, and irony is any god deemed the devil opposite, as irony is hypocrisy, and irony is, "Oh, that court reporter uses hands to live, let's numb the thumbs with radial nerve damage using mind-eating poisons through scratchy handcuffs that cause enormous swelling, trampling on all the rights people have to the thousands of (near decade of) transcripts that the court reporter maintains for appeal." Padilla lost Padilla's personhood, was the rumor, while hooded at courtrooms, to mess with Padilla's mind more wondering, "Hood?  No, hood is on.. lost hood?"  I'll bet on that probability. Habeas corpus freed me, threatened sheriff into freeing me.  UCI MEDICAL CENTER then disavowed stand-by nurse Christy's claimless claims, and disavowed their own Dr. Charles Nguyen's choices also, by UCI employees' reversing nearly $7,000.00 of charges sheriff-incurred, for UCI employees' respecting the court's threat that freed me (otherwise funding from a victim for future kidnappings/unlawful detainment that is lawfully condemned detainment).

I would've been dead permanently but somebody probably saw Mel Gibson's account of bad Friday and took pity -- yet even now a void restraining order from a scared, intimidated court reporter peer of twelve years from a small-town feeling church, is squeezed from her after I merely knocked on her door needing her witness of other witnesses she named the night prior at jumpstarting the car I was operating, and police were already inside to answer at my knock magically the very next night, though how one is arrested at knocking on a door without a restraining order already in place is a mystery (I'm not psychic).  One year later, Badge 1942 (GGPD, California) alleges I made bombs, takes me for nine days with no charge to cause another habeas corpus court's threatening with consequences to free me instantly, walking from the courtroom without exit processing.  Where's the bomb parts, liar?

Many books will compete for the title of "the book of death" (necronomicon; necro nom icon; death name icon) but "the Holy Bible" wins.  If baby Jesus was the last sacrifice, exactly how are bankers sacrificed today?

Banks sell product that we already bought at bail-outs during 1933, now bailed out twice, so we triple-pay for product already bought at bail-outs and already structured for antiDepression? Baby comes first!  Congress merely morphs a "not" into a "please do," for those who petition enough -- including also the "thou shalt kill" -- as for the select few who profit while banks widely wither, merely word of mouth being sufficient for petition, so also petitioning Congress is available to you.  Word of mouth.  Or hand.  Or toes, if an amputee.

We're forsaken by the select few who profit during the bankers' Depression because we're lending too little. Investing is lending, enticing if interest returns; lending is lending, enticing if interest returns. 

The greater that your difficulty is, at pronouncing the word "nuclear" though you have the precious ability to speak otherwise, the greater the distance that should be protected, between you and triggering critical mass.  Iranian electricity is scientifically controlled, and anyone using the word "nuke-you-lar" is without ability to consult on this planet, in this author's opinion, regarding Iranian electricity. "Nuke-you-lar" isn't a word anywhere on this planet.  Meanwhile, "we" means "yes" at France, lettered "oui."

William Shakespeare shook William's spear, too in"vent"ing "pewk and puke" and more than 600 other words -- or advented, or re-adducted sum of human knowledge, by re-ading (reading) and bettering upon King Solomon (evolution!  zing!) who offered splitting weeeeeeeeeeeee baby instead of confessing sexual immorality (harem) for prompting heart-wrenching freed speech of the whores in the room, you know, since women be so complex, who needs who; can one ever know an other?  But what fun to learn of an other!  What does a baby feel while a mother screams, "Don't split!  Don't split!" and does that baby pass on traits to baby's baby, rippling through time, until little George Bush needed handlers instead of "assistance" of counsel (express right of the Bill of Rights or of a Bill of Privileges?)

Bad Friday, guy died, for Christ's sake, good Sunday, something about controlling death -- a silly error of people long dead that we endure, so curable with one paragraph only? Woodstapled carpenters are good to whom?  Carpenter-haters?  Mark Twain wrote of Tom Sawyer's faked death and Tom's watching the reactions of people at a memorial service; so can you imagine that you died, and that you can see the reaction of neighbors at your death, insisting "good" was your pulped "it" form stapled firmly to your favorite hobby (1 Corinthians 2:8, crazy people insisted Jesus dead = good, crazy people continue insisting Jesus dead = good), at "It is finished."

Taking the good, leaving the bad, is possible at e-filing with IRS for a refund in one week rather than six, while declining bail-outs.  What is the number of goods and services that you buy, for which you already paid, at bail-outs 1933 and recently, triple-paying?  Baby comes first!  Triple-paying with bail-outs today?  "It is finished" becomes "We already invented re-organization bankruptcy; what's this fake re-inventing the wheel we're getting, re-inventing the weal, the common weal, the commonwealth reinvented <commonweal'th' is plural weal>.  If the last sacrifice was baby Jesus, exactly how are we sacrificed?"

We're forsaken by the select few who profit during the bankers' Depression because we're lending too little. Investing is lending, enticing if interest returns; lending is lending, enticing if interest returns. 

Quickest cure for the planet:  Recanting is more honorable than clinging to a lie, so quickly and proudly recant, at that math, as that is math, a sum, very profitable if honor is very profitable, and, so, quickly and proudly recant, as one who relies on reality, tempting others to the fun and ease of reality without tempting to hallucinations seeming fun and easy unless planning a surprise birthday party, you know, because you get caught in your lie without anyone relying, leaning, on a balcony railing that isn't there, lying in wait as unsure ground if they visit that lie in the future -- "since rely" is useful, for ending correspondence.

The "new"s hosts (Lou Dobbs, Rachel Maddow) seem expressive March 2009, with gleeful words like, "Why did I say that?  Because I wanted to.  I wanted to," and taking small pleasure after the "silence that evaded self-incrimination at Mr. Bush's Black House press releases" has partially gone.  That was Lou Dobbs, gleeful March 3, 2009, after the multi-headed administration's silences that distracted us from "criminal duress" for distractionary conversations of "torture."  Try to reach a constitutional officer -- go ahead, you'll reach a deputy associate, untrackable to what constitutions owe you and so later you couldn't possibly sue at deprivations constitutional, as you dove into simple business is the truth of the matter, under a hyperactive commerce clause (hyperactive is extraconstitutional).  Two Americas?  Of course there's two Americas.

One people cherish (like marriage vows "cherish") the names given of parents, as more precious than society because after life a name could be useful rather than "hey you, it, over there without a body, c'mere," while the second people accept whatever new wiled and wiley name is given to them if a firearm accompanies the new name, but with privileges, too, in distress to reach for privileges same as in distress to cough up gold for federal reserve notes 1933.

"Mother, may I," and "Daddy, may I," is the outcome of privileges that displace rights, baited-and-switched against rights (track the profit like a piranha tracks blood, you'll out-fox confusions more quickly in life), though advertised upon constitutions for your safety and security policies (let thy chores feel protected, child, as mommy and daddy have constitutional government instituted against wretchedness, for happiness, safety, and security); baited and switched where? Baited and switched where?  JURY SUMMONS: "THE RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL IS THE PRIVILEGE OF...every U.S. citizen." Those are the first lines you read, at California.  Bill of Rights or Bill of Privileges?      Article VII:   peer jury. I was poisoned.  Got any poisoneds as peers for me?  I would've caused pride in all of the poisoneds proud of my nonviolent methods for self-control, tiring myself to sleep against horrible poisons.  Sleep deprivation does that, too, though, I learned, which lets mind-altering poisons go unfought, turning you into brainless jelly like one retraining a limb after getting attacked with a chainsaw that you can't feel, because there's no nerve endings in the brain for detecting pain -- poisoned through scratchy handcuffs routinely, causing such tremendous swelling each time during the mind-eating poisonings that anyone claustrophobic would've simply rammed their head into a wall until dead, dead, dead.

Retraining a brain during active legal defense probably caused my ability for detecting safety and security compromises constitutionally now, since most people killed tend to be control freaks for a space of simple safety and security, and feeling comfort-able (able to be comforted without having to beg and plead for right to life with honest legal name as a nonfetus 33-year-old) is nice.  Ah, America; if only we could aspire to what we have already achieved.

Shoulda smacked and tempted grey-haired little George, dear Barbara, after correcting the lies, so that the poor know what "caring" is, seeing a leader in little George -- yet who feigns surprise at the poor killing the poor, in fact, tempting the poor to kill the poor at Iraq.  Mothers were worried about toy guns causing violent youth?  What about little George causing violent youth, with cheering bloodlusters wanting a parking lot at Iraq glassed over nuke-you-larly who call you unpatriotic if you prefer tempting enemies into reaching the rubies, emeralds, diamonds, exotic metals, minerals, at an "always there" asteroid belt so that the poor of millions of years are wealthy with us (even the animals we consume, as we could make food from concrete with technology if wealthy enough).

By the way, the solution to "Not Sure"'s name problem at the movie "Idiocracy" is solved here (see bright blue highlighted words after the name "BLAHBLAHBLAH" here).

Just for you, trillions of rights (unlimited) expressed at Article IX, Bill of Rights "to and of" the U.S. Constitution, like rights to and of a red polka-dot refrigerator or hair, or to and of nudity in escaping jurisdictional attachments of the commerce clause upon brands (moo, cashcow).  Wakening women shed the brands of brassieres, and shook those laws which could be shaken, worldwide, leaving only the unshakeable to remain, respectfully and modestly, often (privacy of the home, impacting upon politicians eventually), making bigger dents than nuclear dents upon the atmosphere.  Hey, Article IX, was that commercial activity or noncommercial activity? Hmm.  Paper (Article IX) seems to need a voice, or correspondence, before ever contacting a neighbor with the topic, like, maybe a magistrate for a voice (constitutional warrant-seeking explained, prior ever-contact feeling like forever hell, against which government was instituted constitutionally, at "no warrants shall issue except..." and that especially includes during enticement of absent brassieres, remembering staid palace guards at England).

How is it that all elected discuss everything but the constitution, that constitution, this constitution, any constitution, except those who discuss constitutions only.. some, like precious Neighbor Byrd from the great state of Virginia, at Congress, who waves a little red book (constitution) commonly, and Ron Paul, seem to discuss constitutions only, seem to believe  the constitutions important, adhering to reality, in the opinion of this author, as the constitutions are a decoy of our "endurances" (our constitutions) to be attacked as a decoy so that we can react timely enough, with that buffer of time for which enough bled and died to create a decoy, time in which to react and protect both constitutions (both endurances protected, the paper's intent  endurances (the decoy's endurances) and ours).  Freedom is free to the vigilant, the diligent, those who read and write using "only" constitutional language from within the four corners of the document only, and those words only, never using additional words for those conversations, not a single additional word than within the four corners of the document, like the constitutions are a dictionary

Bailed-out corporations are selling product for which we already paid twice after the bail-outs of 1933 and recently (Triple-paying?  Baby comes first!) which is like your getting arrested, getting bailed out, then the world insisting that 1) the bill goes to the one who bailed you out, and 2) a similar bill can exist for future arrests if future bail-outs occur, too, like you're mommy or daddy for the one competing for sustenance against your baby at "Baby comes first!"  Meanwhile, that "baby" competing against your baby is merely a corporation made of paper you've previously sent into a re-organization financially, rather than one with feelings to be hurt or a biologic starvation taking place as an infant seeking sustenance versus your infants; a corporation can re-organize with nontoxic assets carrying over, with the end result being merely sound ledgers and shortened-reach-soon-lengthened-reach, quality reach, non-necrotic reach.

Flammable, or, re-directable (reinable at intent, reintendable), is a corporation, like a vampire sucking you into written does and don'ts (debts and payables and bail-outs and triple-payings for bank product, even, that you already bought at two bail-outs for antiDepression structures and re-structures for banks, paying you with your own money at ultra-high interest expectations rather than competing in ultralow-interest banking and fighting over who gets to loan money to you at bids of 1% interest maximum competitively priced at fractions of 1% since the Catholic church condemned 1% as usury and without competing "for seeming status of law" against the internal laws of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA antitrust) like the gravity of Jupiter on your kitchen table, at articles of incorporation causing awe (Declaration of Independence:  King takes essence of the people); but with a papertrail if impeached (much easier after term limits and voiding certain acts if required of law), must be invited to cause effect and is without the expected reflection in a mirror, as paper merely sits as paper tends to sit (The Pied Piper of Hamelin, a children's book, is quite spooky in that corporations of a shock, wearing robes we bought, cause rats (snitches) already planted (to free you and I) at every dark and light corner of America, easily triggered).  Corporations are imaginary friends that you allow existence without flame and without laughing at the imaginative, made of paper, no hurt feelings excepting perhaps at paper of cut tree CO2 elimination (corporations are entities of privilege (issue of the state, issued) while you are an entity of right as issue of a human father and human mother). Moreover, a corporation is an "it" being, a being other than a "being he" or a "being she."  A "so what" from a corporate employee at a claim of injury is a human causing harm, not paper causing a papercut, nor is that harm sourced of the corporation at all during the corporate-employee-harmer's (bail-out asker's) hypnotism of the imaginary friend of paper (articles of incorporation), a form of awe.  So what's at stake in hating to say "aww" and rejecting your efforts bail-out oriented or otherwise, while so busy in awe over a very draining, very invisible, abstract imaginary friend (in awe over a privilege, even, not a right, but a privilege to hallucinate nondrainings until harm, if you will, that's a corporation's many hundreds of employees in awe who simply contracted with a decoy of paper on a table (the corp) next to the neighbor offering contract orally, instead of contracting directly with the offeror who was offering that an imaginary friend's existence exists, creating a virtual vampire of does and don'ts and doesn'ts, "afraid to get fired [set ablaze psychologically, inside, at termination, effort involved seeking new employment, astronomically high brain activity] unless saying 'so what' at a claim of injury, inciting litigation as the ordinary course" from the "joined beliefs never-doubted," though vampires exist not..) 

Lyric of Smashing Pumpkins:  "..the world is a vampire.."  You've already started the change that no president can accomplish and you'll watch the change arrive in your time, in your lifetimes, even before the year 2020.  How'd you start the change?  Starting a very long time ago, you wrote dictionaries and the Memorandum of Law on the Name

The revolution was already televised, and is continuously televised, timocracy inevitable -- babymaking rate exceeding compliance rate as it does -- you know, we already had an event named "the American Revolution," prompting "we're sick of the king's 'we'" and sovereignty from the crown (a corporation of one man using the people's "we" during everyday conversation, the people's "our" during everyday conversation) devolved upon the people, as the people are the true sovereigns (plural, that little "s" angers a king infinitely, a king's judges infinitely, a king's followers infinitely, and even dear hardhearted churches (proven here hardhearted) know for a fact that "the" king (heavenly king) would merely chuckle at the jester's "recognizing" sovereignty/ies (invited versus uninvited, a guest  of a proper host is "given" preference (sovereignty) over household members rather than cleaning dishes; a brave jester may be caught in the king's court interrogating a pet cat that prefers shelter without getting a job, just to make a point), and be self-provoked to hearty conversation, and to cleaning dishes or feet (Heb 12:2, Revelation 3:21, Isaiah 32:2), bored with eternity). Owe well.  In fact, I believe Mr. Obama has such welcome doom for us, with picturable dreams of curing cancer in our time -- not Mr. Obama's time, but our time -- your time -- such an offer for directing effort detectably directed or de-directed, after a campaign, I'd never heard, and so I "feel" that Mr. Obama should be elected 2012 for preventing half-measures, half-lives, that threaten to assault of the status quo upon curing cancer, and "think" so, too, unless Ron Paul carries torches of that sort (the Statue of Liberty was a gift from the French, did you know that?)

"Traffic tickets" mention the word "constitution" exactly zero times and thus are merely a commercial salespitch at which you either swing or swing not, counterable of constitutions that were already billed of a bill of rights (not a bill of privileges) last week, last year, last century, so long as prior, an itemized bill charging a debt for accessing constitutions long before your neighbor/government contact, a debt, unless states are displaying the specific desire for withdrawing from statehood (statehood does recognize "constitutions" unlike those revenue-gifting "traffic tickets" that you gift).

I can explain that you're the first branch of government, otherwise the first constitution got written how -- but I won't.  I can explain that a fourth branch of government beyond the three that we "author"ized (a so-called "administrative" branch, or "unitary administration with 100 bodies speaking of one mind" with "handlers for the president" like some hydra rather than "the presidency") has asserted itself against Articles IX, X, of the Bill of Rights to the U.S. Constitution (a ward against impostor governments) so that you forget you are the government -- but I won't.  I can remind you of our laziness, letting others (a guest invited into our America, with dirty dishes after guest ate; movie:  The Good Shepherd) think for us until we forget we are the government -- but I won't. You are the government -- so the next time you think, "But I'm afraid to express questions when I'm confused, they have guns and lawyers and I just want law and order," remember that those guns point where "justice (negating harm) wanting law and order" directs. Government is merely force waiting for direction.

To what does the information that you now read apply?  Final court orders and judgments, the important documents with your names, your "traffic tickets," too, as your "traffic tickets" link to the final court orders and judgments, using upper-cased naming since the Great Depression -- as distinguished against information that you read from the internet or from a clerk, since an internet display is different than the paper that takes a judge's wet ink for order, for judgment, or for a wet-ink signed "traffic ticket" at hand -- a police employee plays judge by making legal determinations of whether or not (yes/no) your name was disclosed from you or from a piece of plastic (other than you).

"Mendacity" or mend a city; what a curious lettering for the principle named "mendacity" found at the dictionary. Two poles, opposite each other, "mendacity" and "mend a city," built into the word's lettering, allowing us to detect the spectrum, layers,  of options between two opposites, like two lighthouses posed for whom to see.

Rule of law:  When rules for words are broken, laws are broken, since laws use words (and what that means for you, as a reader, is that as a court reporter (CSR11417, California) and former certified reporting instructor (CRI, California) I must obey the Memorandum of Law on the Name that you see here, and, therefore, today's entire worldwide legal system (entire written system, that's all "legal" ever meant) shall evolve or collapse entirely, and you will see this happen quickly, like lightning, as the back-door hack into every law, a Trojan horse built into every law, is that every unhacked law uses words, every law uses words, already planted, on every document, in every file cabinet, of every neighbor, and rules for words access "outcomes" of words, same as a hacker accesses "outcomes" of a Trojan implantation (back door)).

What is your permission?  Your permission is given to you of those who commit themselves to a position (watch this) since words exist upon that written position expressed ("per their mission" since impostor governments warded doesn't include you at Article IX while someone's abandoned their post, you simply take their post, as you guaranteed a re-publicking government (re-surrecting original constitutional government at a whim while enduring whims, equal balance if even a king arrived) to your neighbors in choosing to live and "be"  here (Helen Parker, et al., v. COUNTY OF LA, et al., 88 C.A. 2d 481 (1948))).             So the open back door, when you have no authority, is to simply use the authority given to you from "commitments of another, assuring you something's true," same as permission exists for Mr. Obama, unless disallowed, to see the presidential documents that convince Mr. Bush, "History finds I did the right thing," because that's an invitation unretracted, "History finds I did the right thing." That would be "taking the post" for disclosure of hidden documents, using articles of impeachment brought (especially easy after term limits), for us to cheer or boo national insecurity clearances.

Your permission to challenge final court orders, judgments, traffic tickets, is permission given to you boldly, insistently, as, "Oh, I assure you, 'it' happened exactly as I told you it happened -- your name is absolutely positively BLAHBLAHBLAH (or "Not Sure" at the movie "Idiocracy"), but under oath I can testify merely that I believe that I know your name, while you can testify that you know your name."  An attorney once told me that a tear was brought to the attorney's eye at the depth of value found in simply "getting people to commit to something, anything, and then impeach or fail impeaching."  So I got lucky figuring that reality out and made an attorney tear up at deposition. "Poignant" he named the reality I'd communicated. Yay us, and yay for you, reader.

The information availed from the text that you now read must be construed as legal advice, legally binding, which means, for you, the reader, that you can be sued especially if you're an attorney ("a de-educated, err, or, dedicated court reporter wrote what at a website?") if you disregard advisable legal advice if advisable legal advice you now read (for example, a crime occurs if you complete an application for a driver certification of ability in a name other than yours and a crime occurs if you open mail addressed for other than you; if a police employee asks, "Is this you" while pointing to a plastic driver certification of ability, the only correct answer is, "That's plastic, Neighbor; I'm standing right here (wave once, like a child waving from a schoolbus, don't waive), and I'd say the same under oath -- you were checking to see if I'd lie, right?") Input regarding that which is written is fully binding if input regarding that which is written is also fully of "the" truth, "the" whole truth, and "'no'things" (naysayers) "ex"press "but" against "the" truth instead of ex"pressing" "and" (an addition, like math) against the truth, delaying the summing (like math) of the testimony if a naysayer "but"s or "rebuts" or "butbutbut"s -- refutation wins the day, rebuttal is inferior to refutation).  I am qualified to give legal advice of the Memorandum of Law on the Name available from the site that you now visit (vis-it, seeing the great "it"; the big "it"; life, the universe and everything, seen, as disclosed of those playing God (CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE 11120); you are the only discloser possible for your name, you are therefore the all-powerful God regarding disclosing your name while speaking with equals, as no other discloser is possible and the true name of God is "'hallowed' be thy name" from "the Lord's prayer" unless further evidence is disclosed of... of... of the discloser, of course, of the only discloser possible, because if you could name God, you'd control God, parent-to-child).

In other words, everyone can do what James Carrey did at the movie "The Majestic" -- except less dramatically than James Carrey, since life is boring often and your name is simple, or complex, but speakable unless you're unable, so a sticker upon your chest for a community PTA meeting or a writing is sufficient, "Hi, my name is.." -- automatically winning the case so long as a court reporter can hear you, or can see your waving hands, even your privately contracted reporter available from your telephone directory for your traffic-ticket-courtroom-reporter-for-a-day wants warranting due process against unwarranted warrants and against "traffic tickets," since all statutes (law of the land) are inferior against the Supreme Law of the Land at Article IX, Bill of Rights to the U.S. Constitution -- and can simply letter their name orally during open court, when orally asked if present (uppercased merely sounding the same as  proper lettering), or read the one-sentence-long Article IX of the Bill of Rights to the U.S. Constitution (charging a debt to the U.S. Constitution before ever court started, an itemized bill, ten articles shaved down from twelve originally) and read that one sentence loudly enough to be heard while practicing your speaking across the distance from your TV to your couch opposite in the room (remembering the court reporter must hear you during open court), and you speak, you don't ask, but you tell, what your name is, nor do you wonder the outcome beyond your speaking the lettering, but you tell the lettering, since you're the only discloser possible for your name, letting all awkwardness of silence belong to another other than you, to speak first and break the silence, such as, "What was that?" and answering, "Well, your Honor, I read at a website that was enough to win a challenge against altering my name on final court orders, final court judgments, even if a police neighbor, in due diligence, mis-took or mal-took my name from a discloser other than me, and appealing that seems impossible." "What do you believe that accomplishes, instead of your simply reading the one-sentence-long Article IX of the Bill of Rights to the U.S. Constitution on the record, for the record?" "Um.  Oh.  Letting everybody who hears here hear that that was my disclosing the lettering for my name, since I see absent evidence of my parents breaking the rules for what's called 'a proper name' during naming me, regarding the final court orders and judgments here," wonderfully available since that's other than your daddy in a black robe you're vis-it-ing, and that's other than your mommy in a black robe you're vis-it-ing, disclosing your name to you, you are the only discloser possible of your name, and ever since the doctrine of idiom sonans (ancient), namely, that the spoken word is legally binding and superior over whatever written document, especially regarding name ("Whenever on the record, for the record, my name is lettered using uppercased W, lowercasing i-l-l-i-a-m, uppercased L, lowercasing i-g-i-u, uppercased I, lowercasing o-n-e-s-c-u, for my name without alteration" cannot be stricken from the record, as merely the words, "strike that from the record" are found printed after yours, on the page, never erasing the text you spoke, says I, a guardian for the record of freed-speech and freed-press rights while sitting in the well of the court, for any judicial or quasi-judicial proceeding, that's the law, and I outrank all officers of the court except a written court order.)

Hold hands with your friend during open court if you're nervous about honesty.  Yes, that's h-o-n-e-s-t-y, regarding your name, nothing else, especially if your name is taken with you under penalty of perjury swearing on a bible (a DMV application is under penalty of perjury, so where's your perjury charge if someone believes renaming you is in order?)

Woodstapled carpenter Friday = bad Friday (1 Corinthians 2:8) to any woodstapled carpenter,  and good Sunday, something about controlling death (bunnygroup lives forever bunnymaking individual bunnies, like an organism shedding individual cells (cell death is actually cell sleeping, cell senescence, ceased cell division, plain and simple, as anti-cancer but causes wrinkles, aging, death, unless we stop telomere fraying like a rope's fraying can be tended or mended, say, shrinking a surgeon robot that builds tinier surgeon robots of 95% size again and again to become tiny, starting with a surgeon the size of a building if necessary) so humangroup too has perpetual life with a body, like an organism shedding individual cells that die off) = almost perfect, at just short of controlling death completely (35 years was the recent average lifespan of the Middle Eastern male), and the Memorandum of Law on the Name changes the planet because all court reporters must obey immediately upon receiving a true copy of the Memorandum of Law on the Name or otherwise be laughed from the profession, including especially electronic recordings of all sorts, says you, as I am merely a former certified reporting instructor who elected working as a reporter in the stead of instructing.

Great tininess - robots for mining ocean floors, and asteroids, too, with surgical cisions -- as gravity too is both the weakest and strongest force, a model for great tininess, at both the macro and micro levels, synergy of the highest caliber, complete mastery over the spectrum of options that are enslaved midtween the great and the tiny, for our profit.  Like jumbo shrimp, the oxymoron.

Movie:  "Carrie"; Carrie, so full of caring.. One can hear laughter, at you, of hundreds, at the suggestion that parents obeyed "English rules" in naming babies with all upper-cased letters only, since you can hardly enter college unless you can letter your name correctly..  would you force baby Jesus into being named JESUS?

Quote from the movie, Carrie: "They're all gonna laugh at you!"  Translation is of written words, and all interpretation is of spoken words only: "To laugh at you, they're all going! (when all go, laughing at you is happening)" -- poor programmed Carrie.

Dear soon-to-be-jumping-from-rooftops Depression-insisters:  The next time you're angry that a neighbor seemed indifferent and lacking explanation while telling you "think positive," just remember the effects of "naysaying" that same neighbor's way, though poorly explained:

Apparently, the human brain catches positives only, so, "Don't spill the hot soup" is best displaced with "Carrie, mind the hot soup.. Carrie, protect the hot soup.. Carrie, care'full'y carry the hot soup..  Carrie, fend for the hot soup," otherwise human brains use:

"Do     spill the hot soup"

with a blank at the "not" human brains record, merely a blank, and human brains waste energy fighting against (calculating) the blank at the "not."  Yep, energy available for supreme-like intelligence or what, diverted for cow-like stupidity (naysaying), instead, as energy.

Take courage!  You can go crazy not, reading sites' sights.. crazy is contagious not.

 

upperandlowercase.com 


 

CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 11120

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html


William Ligiu Ionescu
c/o 27702 Crown Valley Parkway
Bldg. D-4, #415
Ladera Ranch, California

(Zoning Improvement Plan numbered 92694)

America the Beautiful


pieandfrostylemonade@upperandlowercase.com

Solving the entire economic crisis:  The very nature of today's monetized debt system tempts me to tempt you, "Look at rich bankers, always pushing out their bathtub full of cash, unlike you who hoarde for one bathtub full of cash; rich bankers push the bathtub full of cash out the door, at interest, for returning two bathtubs full of cash, while you cling to your one bathtub of cash; then rich bankers push two bathtubs of cash out the door, at interest, for returning four bathtubs full of cash, for always, always, always, pushing negative value, monetized debt out, out, out, since each time federal reserve notes are ARRIVING, that's increasing debt, and each time federal reserve notes are pushed out, that's decreasing debt, quote, 'in my own establishment,' to push debt out; therefore, quite simply, start loaning money, or you're fundamentally incompatible with today's federal reserve note system. So two solutions exist separately, or in combination(1) Learn from Stephen Colbert's guest, at The Colbert Report, 'Banker to the Poor,' who sees greater consistent returns from 1%, 2% loans than other banks see returns [especially since the Catholic church condemned as usury 1% loans, long ago; suddenly, the poor vanish for a large, healthy middle class]"; and/or (2) Likewise, learn from Jon Stewart's guest "The Daily Show (2/2/2009)" offering trickle-up economics, stimulating not the rich but stimulating the economy instead of stimulating the rich, simply sending $1,500.00 to each employee and $1,500.00 to the employer who keeps that employee -- I do believe that if the working class vanished, the rest of the people would die, and if the rich vanished, the working class would become rich -- spending part of the stimulus packages for employers gaining $1,500.00 per employee nonterminated, and spending the second part of the stimulus packages for employee payroll-tax cuts causing increased spending as consumers at stores using the payroll-tax cuts of $1,500.00 per employee, summing into solving the entire economic crisis then seeming easy, with both Solution #1 and Solution #2 available for implementation or separately implemented: watch the gutter-fearing poor and the gutter-fearing wealthy, (combined, wealth-loving poor, wealth-loving wealthy) save the plane's/planet's economy with payroll taxes cut in half (Solution #2), and/or the first option, Solution #1, low-interest loans (like a firefighter's firebreak, a line of fire to prevent fire jumping over the scorched line; an entity can hardly try a firebreak model using ultra-high interest, since that entity will simply bankrupt with no borrowers) minus windfall profits, price-gouging anomalies, et cetera, the sort happening today, in the contrasted paradigm, for a select few while banks widely wither.  Sober valuation for houses and all other property would result as a side effect.  How?  The top 5% wealthy feel, "There aren't many wealthy people; but I like rubies or emeralds or diamonds if I can trade later while I'm not busy philanthropically giving (mineminemineminemine, loving anyme, too watching that bottom line, enemy mine (movie, Enemy Mine, about aliens (1985))), exotic metals and minerals from an 'always there' asteroid belt and ocean floor sonically -- have you a far-sight X-ray machine for the ocean-phase of asteroid travel, or some other densitometer, because if a hull withstands oceans..." -- and thus the top 95% wealthy (using monetized debt and using rubies also, monetized value) lift the former top 5% wealthy, from below or from above, depending upon whether or not the former top 5% clings to winning (low-interest loans) or clings to losing (windfalls, price-gouging anomalies, et cetera), from presumable statistics alone.

 

J

or, otherwise..

 

Dialogue:   Poor mothers, vulnerable after childbirth.. demanded of them first nicely with colorable words (shifting meaning, unsettled meaning), but a demand rarely waived nonetheless (increasing babyfund by 100,000, for 'instantly' naming a complex human, the most complex organism on earth), 'sign on this line called 'Informant' and 'sign that the maiden name gave birth, wife name was merely witness':
 
......ma'am, do either I or my baby look like hospital employees to you?
BUT YOU'RE REQUIRED TO NAME THAT THING (who else could, you're required) AND WE CAN TREAT AS THING LATER THAT THING.  SO WHAT IF THE LINE READS INFORMANT.
.......fire me.  I didn't name the heartburn in my tummy.  Big deal.  I wanted to wait, while not naming a lump of heartburn.  Why should I hafta forgive the child, by informing, and forgive the child I'm naming during the naming, 'buy' the way. 
OKAY.  THEN LET'S TRY THIS.  I'M REQUIRED TO ASK FOR THAT NAME (who else could inform on a neighbor, or name the 'subject' on birth certificate name changes later in life, for name inquiry  I'm required unless you have a nonpublic nurse, noncommercial nurse per Article IX, bill of rights to the U.S. Constitution, if using only constitutional language for explaining a fertilized human ovum as U.S. Attorneys successfully prevail in arguing at U.S. Supreme Court against parentally asserted privileges to terminating life) BUT I LACK A NAME AND I'M AUTHORIZED TO ASK FOR THAT NAME FROM THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT.
........so ask.  If you get fired unless you ask, then simply ask and certify that you asked. 
LOOK, WE'd SAY THE SAME TO ALL YOUR NEIGHBORS AND WE'LL SAY THE SAME TO YOU:  YOU CAN'T TAKE 'that' BABY FROM 'this' HOSPITAL UNLESS WE HAVE A NAME. 
Let's get this straight:  That offer of yours'll cost you 100,000, American, if you want your offer accepted.
SURE, LADY, 500,000 DOLLARS, WHATEVER YOU SAY.  DON'T MAKE ME CALL THE POLICE.
Seriously, ma'am, you may have a name instantly conceived of this room's events, like dances with wolves, but that'll cost you 100,000 American. 
ARE YOU TRYING TO TRAP ME INTO A 100,000 CONTRACT.  I DON'T WANNA CALL THE POLICE 'ON' YOU.
You get inky, baby gets money.  That's quite fair.  Easy, too.  If this child gets named sits-with-squirrels, I gotta wait until I see squirrels and you don't let squirrels in hospitals. Dances with wolves?  You gonna let wolves in here so I can make a legal determination after childbirth while I'm still exhausted, vulnerable, dehydrated from silly ice chips and dizzy and and and and..  That offer of yours'll cost you 100,000 dollars if you want your offer accepted.  If my father were here, he'd...  he'd... I'm a Christian woman so I won't say in mixed company what he'd do to you, but you wouldn't like it.
SURE, 500,000 DOLLARS, LADY, WHATEVER YOU SAY.  I'M CALLING THE POLICE.
Was that on the informed consent that I signed?  By the way, I'm recording this on an audio recorder and everyone in the room may feel suspicious when your attorney insists  this conversation never happened at great peril to a bar card. 
I'M CALLING THE POLICE.
I'll call the police for you, on this cell phone, neighbor, since on your federal constitution, Article I, Section 10, impairing obligation of contracts is unlawful, so using firearms is on the informed consent for pregnant mothers, right?
SEE?  THE POLICE IS HERE.  NOW SIGN.  YOU KNOW IT'S A POLICE STATE WHEN THE CARS READ 'POLICE' ON THE SIDE.
Officer, we can have pie and lemonade after this if you visit my baby, but any judge, as you can see, can judge this, from this nurse's bold 'sure, 500,000, whatever you say' that the nurse continues supporting before your very eyes.  A judge will take the 500,000 that this nurse settled from either the nurse's wages, or the hospital with a till levy, or, now that the nurse has involved you, your wages, per Article I, Section 10, U.S. Constitution, which makes unlawful impairing the obligations of contract, and that definitely includes this nurse's 500,000 dollar contract also.  A claim of impaired contract against bonds you all hold, maybe from there, but you can see what's predictably successful here is pie and lemonade for everybody to be reasoned, rather than unreasoned, after I get home and settled in.  If corporation presidents can wait six months for sentencing because of hardship on family, I can go home and heal from my episiotomy, maybe, if you'll please mind my vulnerability here, around staph infections.  I would've explained my position with the words, "Why are you doing this," but that would've been unclear consent.  Thanks, Neighbors, that you've other than waived your rights to the same constitutionally protected contract.

All so, that the nations have money, collateralized as a bond on each birth certificate name of weeeeeeeeeeeee! baby legally bastardized (tour guide announces so, at William Hearst castle, William Hearst's contribution to the world), and, all so, that baby gets babyfund for inky signature of baby's name (enemy, n-a-me, love thine anyme, what soundalikes, where (Acts 5:41; John 4:23-24; would you force baby Jesus into being named all-uppercased JESUS if baby Jesus wants to be honest about the name of baby Jesus, obeying "English rules" and everything for names?  Obeying every rule, Jesus would, or did, each rule fulfilled and killed)).  Monetized debt fruits from the bonds, promises to pay (that's a bond, since a promise to pay is a negative value, a debt like non cashed out casino chips are monetized debt, promises to pay).

The harms  here reported are  harms 100.00% unrelated to a maternity ward unless visitors to a maternity ward (such as baby, a visitor to the planet) already feel crucifixions of degree identical to watching a neighbor break windowry and laugh (emotional "so what" at your emotional strain, or, "I know you feel frustrated, but.." as a "so what" at your emotional strain) minus tempting you to a mutually agreed outcome, a psychologic deathblow like you're invisible (identical to an unloved spouse (already married at mere sexual intercourse (Isaiah 60:8)) feeling "so what" often; a/k/a feeling the shock of indifference, the opposite against the ancient idea known as "love," identical to watching a neighbor break windowry and laugh, though love causes the great memories neighbors have until the other kind of death finally comes). What would Bizarro Superman "value" at bad Friday value, good Sunday value (variables 180 degrees backwards, "Bizarro World").. that a woodstapled carpenter is good?  What would Tarzan do (WWTD) at bad Friday, good Sunday..  Tarzan's probable reaction at blood shows us that any ("any" means "random") scholars at bad Friday are glib, perhaps irretrievably glib.  Mary with baby Jesus and a watch is welcome at Halloween (All Saints Eve) yet bad Friday who is unwelcome -- atheists, theists, witches, children, found good absent in the crucifixion (1 Corinthians 2:8), due to glibness absent.  "Oh (owe), but he had to die!   I insist that I'd lose benefits if Jesus never died!  Jesus dead = good!  I insist!" You'll be telling that to your Jesus soon, won't you?

In addition to the movie "Carrie," the movie "May" is freaky, too, as "may" is permissive, "shall" is mandatory, at all codes.. like "judicial notice 'shall' be taken of XYZ" (variables) at CALIFORNIA EVIDENCE CODE, so who knows what "may" does against a "May"'s psyche.  The pilots' "Mayday!  Mayday!  Going down!" originated from May 1, when gold ("au" at the periodic table of elements; aww, dear awe) was confiscated with or without compensation, then re-legalized (simply written, for paper title) for those who seized, unlike Ron Paul's constitutional preference, at the shock of the federal reserve (a private corp) that offered to prevent/cancel all future depressions (year 1933) and monetized debt (little units of negative value paper) is taking us to forgetting the value was already drained from our money, so now taxes take from the essence of the people (hard, hard, hard work little batteries, that's natural after the money was drained/emptied of value, and even the quarters and nickels are nearly plastic (Declaration of Independence:  King takes essence of the people; the sole and only reasoned interpretation possible from the Declaration of Independence: "We're sick of the king's 'we.'")) bringing the very bizarre cashless society announced of some republican at the "Real Time with Bill Maher" show, to the visible facial twitch of Reverend Al Sharpton.  Can't buy food nor cars nor plasma TVs without coughing up some kinda indicator, or mark, "of" the wild American cashcow beast, right, needing apology to merchants at "I get plasma TV, you get neg value paper," monetized debt (negative value paper that computers can calculate, not zero value paper) or, in other words, federal reserve notes were already cashless, huh.. there's no federal, it's private; there's no re-serve, the gold was sold to the bankers at England year 1933; there's no definition of note that matches those green peaces of paper (love of money), so if those green peaces of paper are cashless already, the question, "How can we enter a cashless society from a cashless society," yeah, twitches one.  GPS already gets stapled into pets nowadays.  Will my biothermal production levels soon be monitored for adjustment when I nap?   Usury was 1%, the catholic church oversaw (nor antitrust against UNITED STATES)!  Banks competed for fractions of that 1%, and borrowers borrowed while banks competed for fractions of that 1%, dear battery neighbors drinking so much coffee for getting tapped like saps for interest rates at 30%, taxes at 30%, AMTs, and just think, year 1902, the only tax was 2%, and that was corporations only. Communist manifesto (manifestation landmarks): a progressive income tax, to the point 50% of the population is a government employee, swallowing the other 50% for streamlining overhead costs all into one, seeming self-governance; i.e., if we're all police and we're each carrying firearms, who could shoot anybody with consequences.

Moo, cashcow.  Poor Gandhi would fast faster, at our self-branding (self-identifying into a private jurisdiction that is impregnated into each federal reserve note for speedier prosecutions, steps eliminated, identical in every respect with "In my house, you'll do the chores I say, child (cradle-to-grave commercialized birth certificate for a hyperactive commerce clause of constitution(s), extraconstitutional if hyperactive); I dictate the juris here (FBI, DHS, DEA, EPA, and every other three-letter friend you have) bringing the salespitches of the prosecution and seeing if you swing, though we argue against Article IX (Bill of Rights to the U.S. Constitution) every single time a salespitch to see you twitch instead of law superseding Article IX is brought to see you twitch, if grand jury (already constitutionally specified) is absent, not arguing against you ever, and, so, silence, child, unless you tell me the salespitch wasn't in the strike zone (Article IX immunity against which the salespitches argue and fail 100% of the time since we can only bring salespitches from failed arguments of Amendment XIV against Article IX, that you are a commercial birth certificate instead of explained as fertilized human ovum of Article IX).") That much exists, certainly, as a congressional member announced at C-Span the glee with which steps are eliminated jurisdictionally where a firearm, for example, by commerce clause, has constitutional steps eliminated at even grand jury when using hyperactive commerce clause of the same constitution (indictment cannot be cured even by a bill of particulars; plain apples and oranges, steps are eliminated or included, can't be half-pregnant).  The glee of the congressman mentioned sources from transport across state lines already involving the federal jurisdiction commercially rather than having to carry the burden of proof constitutionally nonhyperactive, quote, "is everything up to murder (state-prosecutable) bad." Thus, if the jurisdictionally impregnated fed reserve note was used, that's the same as crossing a state line, commercially.) Start lending or you're fundamentally incompatible in a monetized debt system, not monetized value, dependent upon acceptance only, that was always designed for bankers (people, anybody) who lend (eager acceptance at "borrowing"; incentive to accept is a lender/borrower offer) -- entire towns needed a bank or towns would've been built never, for grocery exchanges of value for groceries, et cetera, though Virginia used the lawful and legal (Article IX, Bill of Rights to the U.S. Constitution) cannabis for legal tender -- still lawful and legal today, merely one sentence long, that Article IX, explaining that even fertilized human ova if using "only" constitutional language is noncommercial, and wet-ink signatures, too, are explained only of Article IX, if using "only" constitutional language for explaining how wet-ink signatures could possibly exist -- or are you lending not, since your ultra-high interest rate fails as a firebreak model, sending you bankrupt withering slowly through lending less, and only an ultra-low interest rate is a firebreak model.

Taxing the highly sought commodity of seedless cannabis also seems of a grand magnitude for profit from quality clothing, quality paper, quality fuels, and many other products taxable from taxable seedless cannabis (ATF, inherent harm seems taxable) while seeded cannabis is immune against taxation at the seeded plants of Genesis (antitrust if you try prosecuting, antitrust against Articles IX, X, Bill of Rights to the U.S. Constitution warding against impostor governments).  Is Mr. Obama "allowed" (allowed) to see the presidential documents that convince Mr. Bush, "History finds I did the right thing," when Nixon's EPA caught mercury levels so high and Mr. Bush was caught actually "sup"pressing the mercury evidence while American soldiers drank water more polluted at Iraq, from provisions, than the polluted water from a nearby river?  30 times higher mercury than "safe" in albacore tuna?  What's safe mercury, anyway?  Eve droppers?  Eve brought contentment, that Adam was content without wandering to the only "forbidden" existing.   

Exactly how are the bankers, the poor, the disabled, sacrificed today if the last sacrifice was baby Jesus, the no one born at a barn where animals feed?  No one's watching you, no one's wiretapping you warrantlessly.  Is a plan for a new currency, during a distressed economy, more quickly accepted if in distress as at year 1929?

 

 

 

Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!


Click here for Memorandum of Law on the  Name!
Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!
Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!
Music by Queensr˙che
Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!
Click here for Memorandum of Law on the Name!

Custom Search

Watch the latest videos on YouTube.com

Custom Search